3 Jan 2012

Culture and Community

I’ve got form with museums. But it fell considerably short of the
knowledge that I needed to develop about a whole new aspect of
professional life. So, I spent quite a lot of time over summer and
autumn with museum folk - learning, listening, debating, thinking,
coming to some early personal conclusions on differences and
synergies with the much more familiar (to me) arts world.

The Aycliffe and District Bus Preservation Society wasn’t, in all
honesty, the visit that I was most looking forward to. Buses have no
real locus in my life. But what I saw of the craft, the commitment,
the voluntary effort and the enterprise was a revelation, even to my
slightly jaded eyes, almost too used to meeting people acutely
passionate about their subject.

The society gets those bus beauties in full working order (and
starring in heartwarming historical dramas amongst other things) and
last year the volunteers also took part in a local school history
project. No doubt there were talks and expert advice from the bus
chaps, a bit of intergenerational interviewing and a number of
animation workshops. The result is this cute claymation about the
Aycliffe Angels, local female wartime munitions workers.

Not earth-shattering, not meant to be, but an example of the local,
engaging, participant-inspiring one-off creative project that happens
in communities everywhere.

I put it under the new heritage section in my mental ‘stories that
make the case for culture’’ file. The arts section is in overspill,
I’ve been collecting material for 20 years. 20 years.

And yet, 2 decades on and somehow the cumulative effect isn’t enough.
Creative work within communities (of geography, or interest or both)
has evolved; in the late 80’s, quality or innovation wasn’t
always an outcome that was given any credence - those artists who
produced the game-changing, creative and inspiring work often didn’t
(wouldn’t) get involved, and in the 90’s instrumentalism still skewed
the starting points. That didn’t stop some amazing stuff happening
and building body of evidence, knowledge, practice

But the potential for communities to really power up through culture
has still to be realised. It’s partially a result of the
short-termism caused by politics or under-funding or lack of tenacity,
or, just occasionally, a lack of authenticity, or humanity or
brilliant ideas.

The newly announced £37 million Arts Council Creative People and
Places fund
with it’s ten-year planning context is a definite step in
the right direction (and a north/midlands direction at that). But I
think the step-change will be the changing face of community activism
and the place of artists and creatives within that. There’s a palpable
difference in the political, social, civic awareness and activism of
both artists and institutions. It was an artist Dan Thompson who led
the riot cleanup campaign, and catalyses the creative role of empty
shops in failing high streets, a cultural activist Emma Bearman who
nurtures and drives a blog platform for improved life in Leeds, and
my twitter feed is full of cultural leaders with both a mandate and an
active voice in the wider (non-cultural) development of a city or
region.

The power of social media to mobilise, inform, catalyse can and should
scale up localised, active creative, networks with goals of long-term
change, where artists are as as much intervener as interpreter, as
much citizen as producer. It puts the unflinching commitment of
long-running community connecters - like bus preservers – in an
entirely different context.

The local authority areas in the lowest 20% of arts engagement
highlighted in the Creative People and Places information correspond
largely, with an equally low position in most other social or economic
indices. While culture isn’t necessarily the answer, it can
definitely, defiantly ask bigger questions.

2 Dec 2011

Globe Gallery auction

I bang on about resilience, collaboration, generosity quite a lot.  And even as I’m doing it, I’m a bit afraid that they’re becoming public sector buzz-words , and on the verge of losing their basic truth and authenticity.  And then things like Globe Gallery’s auction come along and the words regain their meaning.  Globe, a contemporary  gallery in the centre of Newcastle is pretty determined about surviving  hard times and funding changes:  their generosity, energy and  commitment to art and artists over many years is being paid back.  Many hours of volunteer time spent getting a new space ready,  an eclectic mix of donated furniture that manages to look like an knowing version of an early 70’s Heal’s window display, 3 exhibitions opened....and  for some creative fundraising, a stunning array of donated artist works  (Douglas Gordon, Jane & Louise Wilson, many more) that are being auctioned live in about half an hour.  If you’re in Newcastle, or anywhere near, go now. If you’re on the way, and bidding, be generous. 

 

 

 

9 Aug 2011

how a festival makes him feel

I started working on a post about SIRF11,(formerly known as Stockton
international riverside festival before the fashion for acronyms as
words) Its now its 24th year, bringing the best* in international
street theatre, to the streets (and river) of Stockton. Its sometimes
bemusing, occasionally shocking but always exhilarating, and its grown
and flourished here in small-town north east.
*and yes, that's the actual best, not what's 'good-enough' or 'on its
way somewhere else better'. 

But instead I'm glued to rolling news on telly and twitter, as the
incomprehensible but somehow always-going-happen scenes play out.

So for now, just 2 images

the finale of the festival (watch the last minute or so)

and below, a screen grab from some of Carol Alevroyianni's (@calevroyianni) footage of the night

Better_than_drugs
 In a different context, this image might stand for something else But he's watching the Argentinian company Voala, suspended form a 100 tonne crane over the river Tees, and he's saying what its making him feel, which is this: "its better than drugs" 


No parallels drawn, no spurious conclusions arrived at, except that primal thrills can take many forms, including art

28 Jul 2011

Cultural Olympiad - a view from last year....

I wrote this piece for the Newcastle Journal a year ago. Think it’s still true

In the early days of the Olympic announcements, there was some
cynicism from those in the arts and cultural sector, a doubting of its
relevance to the UK beyond London, questions about affordability, all
fuelled, perhaps, by a few misconceptions. There’s a really old
French and Saunders sketch, where the two play a couple of art
students on holiday, all severe hair and black polo-necks, making
pretentious observations while naive-but-happy holidaymakers frolic
around the beach in early forms of lycra. Switch the beach for the
athletics field, and you have the old stereotypes of art and sport,
and the distance between them. They’re out of date, culturally and
also personally – speaking as an avid arts consumer, an arts
bureaucrat, a regular runner and competitive* rower.
Pierre de Coubertin, The founder of the modern Olympics was a sports
all-rounder and the son of an artist, and his original vision was for
an inspirational international event that showcased the best in art as
well as sport. In fact, up until 1948, there were medals awarded for
art. Would today’s artists welcome a gold medal on top of critical
acclaim? I’m not sure, but I can picture a public art podium with
Antony Gormley, Anish Kapoor and Claes Oldenburg all of who have
created some of their best, if not their greatest work for the North
East.
The 2012 Olympics will be accompanied by a year long celebration of
the best in arts and creativity, and the north east can both inspire
and be inspired by this. We have one of the finest examples of mass
participation in sport and arts here in Tyneside. The Great North Run
has a hugely ambitious cultural programme attached to it,
commissioning dance, music, visual art and film. The artists involved
always visit, and in some cases actually run the half-marathon,
before going on to create a response to the extraordinary energy and
emotion of 50,000 runners, an iconic route and the world’s elite
alongside the first-time entrant fulfilling an incredible personal
achievement.
It’s that sense of being part of an inspirational event on a very
personal level that’s both the challenge and the opportunity for the
cultural sector as we approach 2012. There are brilliantly
imaginative ideas coming through from communities and artists that use
the games as a catalyst, and build on some of the pioneering festivals
and events on Tyneside. At the same time, arts organisations in
Newcastle and Gateshead are undertaking some fascinating research that
adds to the body of evidence that shows, ultimately, its personal
relationships that help us make that leap to try out something new.
Those networks of personal relationships are the key to unlocking a
more authentic and equal relationships between art and communities.
Creativity on an international scale connected to people at the most
local level possible? Sounds like a winning aspiration to me
*Competitive* doesn’t equal *winning* in my case

26 Jul 2011

briefly, art and mining

Artists, miners, social history and contemporary creativity: Lee
Hall's Pitmen Painters hits the West End this autumn via Broadway by
way of Newcastle. The originals - the collection compiled by the
Ashington Group are permanently at home at Woodhorn Museum in
Northumberland http://www.experiencewoodhorn.com/the-pitman-painters/
and need to be seen.

And if you want to experience the artist bringing history to life,
whilst making you weepingly grateful that its consigned to the past,
The Unthank's heartbreaking reworking of testimony from Lord Ashleys
mines commission of 1842 should do the trick:

25 Jul 2011

Why I still love book club, after all this time

Wikipedia has this to say about book clubs:

'One of the problems with these clubs is that some members regard them
as opportunities for social contact and conversation veering off onto
a wide variety of non-literary topics, while others hope to engage in
serious literary analysis focused on the book in question and related
works. Still others suggest a book not because they are interested in
it from a literary point-of-view but because they think it will offer
them an opportunity to make points of personal interest to them.
Different expectations and education/skill levels may lead to
conflicts and disappointments in clubs of this kind'

My book club met this week (The Best of Everything, Rona Jaffe’s
Madmen-inspiring story of creative career girls in 50’s Manhattan
since you ask). We’ve been meeting every month (with a short break
for regrouping, see below) for seven years, and while we’ve avoided
literary-based conflicts and disappointments, the life-based ones add
up to a very human story: two babies born, a baby died, two
separations, one divorce (followed by a reduction in membership, one
of those his friends/my friends situations) and maybe it was even
cover for an affair, we never knew, but she was called away
suspiciously early, suspiciously often. All human life (or the bits
of it associated with a bunch of 30/40-something women) is here

But mostly, we read books, - sometimes great books - and we talk about
them, and we have a drink, and we drift between literary criticism and
gossipy critique of people we know and films and families and men.

If I was at work, maybe I’d be thinking about how we’re engaging with
great art, and the impact of the Richards and the Judies and all the
book club machinery on the production, distribution and consumption of
literary (ish) fiction. But I’m not, so I don’t. We do do great art:
Tolstoy, Coover, Murakami. But its not curated or co-ordinated or
evaluated. Its not for everyone, it’s just for us

And, with no literary merit whatsoever, here's some interesting, generally idiosyncratic book facts from the
last seven years:

Book which caused the most unbookish debate: John Irving,: A prayer
for Owen Meany “would you get off with Owen Meany?” (8 to 2 against
if you’re interested)

Book that got my son back into reading, after I artfully left it open,
(so Oprah, I actually I don't care if its true or not): James Frey, A
Million Little pieces.

Book which made us think that the reading public might be poor foolish
dupes: Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code

Ditto: Paul Coelho: The Alchemist

We haven’t picked next month’s yet. Any ideas?

5 Jul 2011

Collaboration (pt1 of many) a marriage of true minds?

Collaborative working has replaced partnership working as the most-claimed mode of operation, in the public sector at least. Its subtext (and sometimes just its text) is one of efficiency and cost-saving, but as the cuts-based reality bites into the cultural sector, a new language is emerging. It’s a bit surprising, and it will be interesting to see how many learn it, and who lives it.  It’s a language that speaks of sharing, generosity, honesty: it’s definitely the language of relationships - It’s not a great distance from the language of love.

 I’ve been to two linked collaborative working events in the past couple of weeks, Lets Work Together and Stronger Together (can you see a theme emerging here?) The former was part round-up of LARC’s (Liverpool Arts and Regeneration Consortium) Thrive programme, part vehicle to bring together key people to explore and define how we work together in the arts.  The latter, a gathering of artists, arts organisations and thinkers having a big, often frank creative chat about how sharing and collaboration will reset the cultural sector.

 Have a look at the twitterfeed #artstogether to get a bit of the buzz, and read some reflections and contributions from Mark Robinson, Lyn Gardner and Alan Lane to whom I already probably owe royalties for over-use of he phrase ‘its not impossible, you just wanted other things  more’

 As the creative voice at the first event, Alistair Upton (Bluecoat) spoke about the joylessness of collaborating only for efficiency, and the ‘hard slog up the shared services hill’.  At Stronger Together Erica Whyman (Northern Stage) and Marcus Romer (Pilot Theatre) touched on the creativity and urgency of sharing ideas, people and resources.  And Maria Balshaw (joint Chief Executive of Whitworth and Manchester Art galleries, the latter formerly headed up by her husband Nick Merriman) talked about the ultimate collaboration, marriage.  She wasn’t quite advocating marriage as a viable collaborative working option for us all, but the fundamentals of the personal relationship have a lot to say about the professional: ‘you must care about what happens to the other person at least as much as you care for yourself’.

 The marriage metaphor doesn’t bear too much scrutiny, not least around the get-out clauses, but there is something in those very successful marriages, where strong individual identity and the unity of the couple are mutually inclusive, that  reflects the fact that a joint endeavour doesn’t subsume co-producers, project partners or co-located organisations, it strengthens them.

 Unexpectedly, these events and conversations have rather altered my view about the place of costs and efficiencies in collaborative working: yes, it has to be a consideration and an outcome, and that’s ethical as much as practical. But a starting point that commits to sharing resources for creativity will definitely extract more value and almost certainly reduce overall cost, while a starting point that just reducing costs will just achieve that. And that’s not enough

 


_

20 May 2011

...it's not the place's fault

The announcement of the route destinations for the Olympic Torch Relay, stopping at towns and cities all over the UK has brought the inevitable mix of cheers (hurrah, its coming to my town) and dismay (boo, it’s not coming to my town/double boo, it’s going to the rival town up the road).  That mixture of pride, disappointment and questions in the house (in the case of Sunderland) is a reminder that people, mostly, are bothered about the place they live or are from:  and both identify with it, and find identity within it.  Those networks and neighbourhoods might draw you closer or send you hot-foot towards streets paved with gold, but either way they’re powerful.  

 

Public Agencies, government bureaucracies and organisations with a social improvement role often have a very particular approach to places (or ‘Place’), as a set of evidence-based administrative boundaries in which to deploy resources for maximum effect. It’s a logical, ethical way to arrange service provision.

 

But sometimes, we talk about the places that people live, forgetting that people live there.

 

The drive for fair and equitable access to, health, education, social care, culture should be ongoing, unrelenting, and innovating. And to always remember that in every ‘action zone’, ‘cold spot’ or ‘area of multiple deprivation’, there’s a set of people who call it ‘home’.

 

‘...it’s not the place’s fault,’ I said.

‘Nothing, like something, happens anywhere.’

Philip Larkin

 

 

 

17 May 2011

Leading Women

This year’s Sunday Times rich list shocker – apparently even more comment-worthy than the fact that the very wealthy are getting even more so - was that for the first time ever, there were 100 rich women amongst the 1000 richest people.  That’s 10%.  Not a large figure compared to the number of women that make up the workforce/society - the population equilibrium figure of (about) 50%.

 

If entrepreneurship is one of the best ways to make your first million (the marriage/divorce route taken by a couple of those 100 women is just too much like hard work), is the picture any better at the start-up/small business end of things?   Marginally, but still a way off equality: the most recent BIS Small business survey reports that only 14% of SME’s (businesses between 1 and 250 employees) are led by women.

 

 And how does that translate itself in the north east, traditionally that most macho of places, where it’s actually true that we don’t hold with coats, much business gets done at the footy (see previous post), 8 am breakfast meetings are alive and well, and lots of chaps still bother with a suit and tie and opening the door for the ladies?

 

In the arts, it translates remarkably successfully.

 

There’s a north eastern trait that I think is stronger and deeper than the (not always altogether unpleasant) remnants of any Gene Hunt-style modes of behaviour:  a proper respect for hard work, passion and principle.  And so, almost counter-intuitively, here there’s an embarrassment of riches in women arts leaders: 50%  of the future Arts Council  national portfolio-funded organisations  in the north east are led by women: 20 creative enterprises*, perhaps not making £millions, but managing all of the small business concerns of bottom lines and bureaucracy while making a uniquely creative product,  including Erica Whyman at Northern Stage creating world class theatre and generously nurturing new talent,  Geraldine Ling developing an authentic artistic voice with learning disabled actors at Lawnmowers, Su Jones  combining commercial acumen with the strongest belief in the necessity of the visual artist at A-N,  and Annabel Turpin at Arc, raising the game in the creative and community role that an arts centre plays. And in the wider arts landscape, Clymene Christofourou and Sharon Bailey leading Isis are the go-to people for international collaborations, and from Sailor Girl to Wunderbar to Unfolding Theatre, a new generation of women are the powerhouse behind newer cultural start-ups. 

 

Making a living as an artist or in the arts world has never been straightforward, and that underpins much of the drive in the sector. And the arts have always attracted women:  we like subject matter that stimulates both intellect and emotion, independence, flexibility and being part of a network of like-minded people. But that doesn’t entirely explain the high level of female leadership here, and I think that comes back to being part of a sector that places the highest value on creativity, in a place that backs a strong work ethic and principled leadership: in the face of that, the glass ceiling is flimsy at best.

 

 

*the list in full...A-N, Arc, Audio Visual Arts North East, Ballet Lorent, Berwick film and Media Arts, Design Event, Inpress, Lawnmowers, mima, New Writing North, Northern Architecture, Northern Stage, November Club, Open Clasp, Seven Stories, Great North Run Cultural Programme, Theatre Hullaballoo, Theatre Sans Frontieres, Zendeh Productions

22 Mar 2011

What I've heard about philanthropy (and football)

You might notice a new caveat on the blog profile. Please do read it, and just to make extra sure that we’re clear what it means, it’s this: even though I work for the arts council, this isn’t an arts council blog about official arts council business.  We’re completely separate entities and everything.  It’s a 65 year old institution; I’m a human woman of a certain age.

 

I got invited to a football match a couple of weekends ago. I’ve been to a few of them in the past 12 months.  In fact, I’ve only ever experienced live football when it involves lunch, networking and 2 teams that I don’t know too much about. Don’t worry men; I’m learning a lot about football itself, so it’s not being wasted on me.

 

Here in the north east, so I’m told, ‘the football’ is where most of the business networking gets done, so if this is one of the ways that I can help connect the arts into that, then I’m going to carry on, in the words of Father Ted’s Mrs Doyle, ‘watching a load of men kicking some leather round a field’

 

So, Everton and Newcastle were on the pitch, and off it, a group of guests from business and the media, talking (amongst other subjects) business sponsorship, individual giving and philanthropy. The banker and the lawyer, aside from representing business that give to the arts, also represent a client base including some of those very ‘high net worth individuals’ that pop up when this subject is discussed.

 

The current challenges in arts funding are pretty clear, and philanthropy  and business sponsorship are all cited as part of the answer, featuring  in Alan Davey’s report  Endowments in the Arts , and discussed (with varying degrees of optimism and cynicism)  in this BBC report

 

As Newcastle lost 2-1, this is what I learned about football: (a) Newcastle need to sort out their defence (b) Everton’s Saha appears to take a dive at every opportunity, and this looks most unmanly.

 

And this is what I gathered from the collective experience of my fellow guests about attitudes of private sector and high-net worth individuals (or ‘rich people’) towards arts giving:

 

  1. They’re interested in giving money to the arts if it has public value – and by that I mean that the public value it.  Human nature really – why would you want to put your name – or your cash - to something unpopular?

 

  1.  They prefer to give to somebody who knows how to run a business properly. Again, why wouldn’t they?

 

  1. The cachet of the arts institution isn’t necessarily a factor, but the reputation and good standing of its leadership often is.

 

  1.  They think the public sector (and by implication the publicly-funded arts sector) is a bit of a slow moving beast that seems to be all talk and little action.  Potential donors might be interested in new ways of getting stuff done, but mostly just in getting stuff done.  If the arts are to embrace new models and be more entrepreneurial, we need to get a bit better about doing it as well as just talking about it

 

  1.  They get how culture makes a place – (admittedly usually cultural buildings), and how important that is to the local economy; they feel a wider responsibility towards the place and its economy, and their place in that – although not necessarily publicly. 

 

 

This makes me wonder whether the often-cited ‘we don’t have a culture of private giving in the UK’ is inherently, or permanently true.  It’s certainly not as visible as the US, but it seems that the attitudinal building blocks might be there.  A sense of commitment or responsibility to a place and its culture is something that’s shared with the arts sector.  A commitment to nurturing that, alongside other funding or income mechanisms must be part of the arts sector’s psyche in the future and not just in London and the south east, but here in the north too.   After all, this is where civic pride and private money combined to create cityscapes of imposing grandeur that are now home to some of the best contemporary cultural buildings and institutions in Europe.

 

 


_

Alison Clark-Jenkins's Space

Blogging, conversing and connecting- about the arts and culture - and the creators, consumers, collaborators and policymakers that have something to do with how arts and culture are experienced. I'm the North-East regional director for Arts Council England, and these are my own views - shaped, naturally, by my professional life and experiences...
but the comments and views expressed on this blog are personal and may not correspond to the views or policy of Arts Council England